Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
피고인은 2013. 12. 21. 22:30경 포항시 북구 C아파트' 앞 노상에서 자신이 타고 왔던 택시의 기사인 D을 폭행하여 신고를 받고 출동한 포항북부경찰서 E파출소 소속 경찰관인 경위 F, G에 의하여 현행범으로 체포된 다음, 같은 날 22:38경 H에 있는 E파출소 주차장으로 호송되어 G으로부터 순찰차에서 내릴 것을 요구받자 주먹으로 G의 머리부위를 1회 때리고 손으로 G을 밀어 G의 머리부위를 나무에 부딪치게 하여 G에게 약 14일간의 치료를 요하는 경추부염좌상 등을 가하고, 같은 날 22:40경 E파출소 안으로 들어가 소란을 피우는 자신에게 수갑을 채우려던 F의 가슴부위를 발로 1회 걷어찼다.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort of flagrant offenders in G, and at the same time inflicted injury on G, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning F's management of the arrested criminals.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement concerning G and F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of detailed G injury diagnosis reports);
1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do134, Jan. 1, 2011
1. The dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act
1. On December 21, 2013, around 22:30, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by the police officer F, and G, who was a police officer belonging to the coastwise Police Station Embox, who was called out after receiving a report by assaulting D, a taxi engineer, who was on the street in front of the c apartment at the port-dong, and was called out. On the same day, at around 22:40, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at around 22:40, the “F Party, who was carrying the box to the ebbbbb box, with I et al., on the part of the civil petitioner, who was able to escape the disturbance.”