1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows 2. The relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to supplementing the determination of the Plaintiff’s assertion as stated in the following 3. Thus, this is cited in accordance with

2. Revised parts

(a) each modification of 3rd 5 parallels “Rod(40)” from “Rod(40) to “lod(40)”, and 3rd 6 parallels “Water Injecting(42a)(46b)” to “Water Injecting(42a)(46a)(46a)”, respectively;

(b) eliminate 3 pages “Incheon Northern Port and Busan New Port” of 11 U.S.

(c) add “6.” to “6.” on the right side of 13 parallels “A1 to 3,”

(d) modify the 3th 14th 14th “equipment” to “equipment or image”, and the 4th 7th s “Monitoring” to “Monitoring” only;

(e) add “the Defendant” to “the right between January 16, 2012” of six pages.

F. F. H (hereinafter “F”) that runs a construction business under the trade name of the 6th parallel “F” as follows:

G. 6 5 pages “G” is operated by I (hereinafter “G”) under the trade name of “G” as amended, as follows:

(h) modify the “instant device” of 7 pages to “bandon excavation device”.

(i) to delete “use” of 7 pages 8 degrees;

(j) It is insufficient to find that the following is insufficient to recognize that the monitors purchased by the Defendant, F, and G from A were destroyed or lost, or completely worn out, and the monitors purchased by the Defendant, F, and G were not reusable due to the following: (a) the video of the evidence Nos. 17 and the testimony of the witness of the trial court at the construction site by means of inserting divings into divings at the construction site, etc.; and (b) the monitors separated from the excavation during the excavation process are also recovered by means of inserting locks at the construction site and by the witness of the trial court at the trial.

3. The supplementary plaintiff asserts as follows.

(e)in other words,