logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2020.06.11 2019고단1484
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 05:20 on October 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim B and obstruction of performance of official duties on the street in the front of D, which is located in C, and on the 112 report that “the Defendant was assaulted by the Defendant; (b) the head of the original police station E Zone B (the age of 34) called the Defendant who was dispatched after receiving the 112 report that “the Defendant was assaulted by the Defendant; and (c) the head of the police station E Zone B (the age of 34) assaulted the street cleaners; (d) the Defendant b’s face b by hand; and (e) the Defendant b’s face was pushed up with B; and (e) committed

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the processing of 112 Declarations and crime prevention, and at the same time, the Defendant was on both sides gallebings requiring two weeks of treatment to the victim B.

2. On October 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) arrested the victim F in the act of committing an act of committing an offense under the same suspicion as described in paragraph (1); (b) assaulted the Defendant, on October 22, 2019, at the back seat of the patrol vehicle G located in the front of the E District; (c) on the back seat of the patrol vehicle parked in the front of the E District, to hand over the Defendant’s personal injury to the Defendant’s seat to the Defendant’s criminal police station and/or the Defendant’s personal injury; and (d) assaulted the Defendant at the right side of the F (37 years of age) of the E District Police Officers

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers with regard to the processing of 112 Reports, and at the same time, the Defendant got a victim F with a face-to-face care for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of B and H;

1. Each statement of F, I, and J;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, each of the relevant statutory provisions and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of each Criminal Code of the Trade Competition (the punishment prescribed for the crimes of injury under paragraph (1), the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties, the crimes of injury under paragraph (2) of the judgment, the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties, the crimes of obstruction of official duties, and the punishment prescribed for the crimes of

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.

arrow