A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sought the “D” main points of the Victim C’s Operation “D”; (b) sought payment from the victim on November 22, 2018; and (c) sought payment from the victim; and (d) made it possible to cut off the board of the victim’s possession, which is installed on the part of the victim’s carter, once, so as to make the repair cost award.

2. On November 22, 2018, at the main point indicated in Paragraph 1, around 22:25, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault to F, who was asked questions about the report and case circumstances from the border F belonging to the original police station E zone, who was dispatched after having received 112 notification to the effect that “the son will not calculate the drinking value;” and who was asked from the head F of the police station E zone affiliated with the original police station E zone, the Defendant used the said F as “the son’s son as her mother,” and used the son’s chest at one time.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement against F and C;

1. Four copies of site photographs, and each investigation report;

1. Application of statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (limited to several previous departments, but considering the circumstances such as agreement and deposit);

1. Probation and order to attend a lecture or order to provide community service under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;