1. The Defendants each of the Plaintiff A, KRW 30,129,875, KRW 71,075,952, and KRW 42,70,072, and each of the above costs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is the owner of the 3rd floor of the 1st floor of reinforced concrete structure, the 1st floor of Busan, F, and the 3rd floor of the 1st floor of the instant building (hereinafter “instant building”); Plaintiff B is the person who operates the pharmacy with the trade name of H pharmacy in the part indicated as “G” indicated in the annexed drawings among the 1st floor of the instant building; Plaintiff C is the person who operates the pharmacy in the part indicated as “H pharmacy” indicated in the annexed drawings among the 1st floor of the instant building.

B. Defendant D leased from Plaintiff A the part indicated as “I” in the separate sheet among the 1st floor of the instant building, and Defendant E, his wife, operated the said mutually accepted shop (hereinafter “Defendant shop”).

C. around 16:00 on March 18, 2012, a fire (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred on the first floor of the instant building, and the said stores were destroyed on the first floor of the instant building by fire, and considerable parts of the goods inside the stores were destroyed.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy

2. Existence of liability for damages

A. The parties asserted that the plaintiffs filed damages on the premise that the fire of this case occurred inside the defendant's store, not within the defendant's store. The defendants asserted that the fire of this case was caused by the illegal reconstruction act of the plaintiff A, the owner of the building of this case, or the lessee's failure to install and check fire safety facilities, and that the fire of this case occurred due to the plaintiff A's failure to use it jointly by the owner or lessee of the building of this case. The defendants asserted that the fire of this case was caused by the plaintiff A's illegal reconstruction act or the construction and inspection duty of fire safety facilities.

B. Fact-finding 1) On March 18, 2012, which was before and after the occurrence of the instant fire, Defendant E and Plaintiff B were only two persons on Sundays at around 16:00 at the time of the occurrence of the instant fire.

B. Defendant prior to the instant fire.