Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On June 18, 2020, at around 01:50 on June 18, 2020, the Defendant suffered disturbance, such as interference with his duties and damage of property, within the “E restaurant” restaurant operated by the victim D ( South, 50 years old), and for the reason that the victim does not have prompt food ordered, it was difficult to avoid disturbance, such as that the victim was on the floor, and that the victim was “if you want to do so, it would have to do so.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force, and at the same time damaged the market value, which is the property owned by the victim.

B. On June 18, 2020, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was requested to make a statement on the circumstances of the instant case from the chief police officer of the Namyang Police Station G police box, who was dispatched to the site after receiving the said D’s 112 report due to the fact that he obstructed the restaurant business, etc. on the street near the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, 2020, to the police officer of the Namyang Police Station G police box, who was dispatched to the site after receiving the said D’s 112 report.

“Along with sound, the chest of the above Ha was flue at one time by drinking.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B’s rank around 02:15 on June 18, 2020

1. B. At the place of port, the Defendant, as above, arrested a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties to the chief police officer of the Namyang Police Station G police box affiliated with the Namyang Police Station G police box, the Defendant laid down the police officer’s outer part of the police officer H by putting him in his hand, knife his hand, and knife him at the scene from the assistant I belonging to the Namyang Police Station G police box located at the scene, and knifeed the Defendant’s knife and knife his body by cutting off the knife of the knife of the knife.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made to H and I by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs statutes;