logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.02.14 2017고단4758
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Definite 21:50 on July 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 1609 Dong 805 on B apartment house 1609; and (b) 112 on July 24, 2017, the Defendant: (c) was defective in: (a) the victim’s security guard D, the police box affiliated with the Gyeonggi-do Police Station C police station C police station, in order to separate the Defendant and other family members; (d) the victim D to separate the Defendant from the other family members of the Defendant; (b) the victim D to “eascing ice, sick, dead, dead, unfined, arrested, unfined, unfined, unfined, unfined, refined, refined, refined,” and (c) the victim E to restrain this.

In addition, I wish to do so;

The victims were openly insultd by referring to a large sound called “finite finch”.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. When the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to special intimidation by the police officers at the time, time, place, etc. mentioned in the above paragraph 1, the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting the face of the police officer at one time and two hand, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties regarding the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime.

B. On July 24, 2017, at around 22:35, the Defendant: (a) arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender as described in the above paragraphs 1 and 2-A at the police box in the Namyang-si Police Station, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, as indicated in the above paragraphs 1 and 2-A; and (b) obstructed a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of a crime by assaulting the police officer by using a guard guard lock to have the Defendant fix the Defendant by using the relevant police box in order to prevent the Defendant’s main violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, G, and H;

1. A copy of each written statement of I, J and H;

1. Scenic photographs;

1. Ethic photo;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Investigation report (victim H and telephone communications);

1. C Devices, ctv video images, applying 1.1.1.

arrow