logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.29 2018고단2926
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 18, 2017.

[Basic Facts] The Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government announced the designation of a housing site development district on January 31, 2006; on January 25, 2006; on January 31, 2006; on January 31, 2006, Sungnam-si, Seoul, Seoul, the Dongwon E-gu, Sungnam-si, and the 6,788,000 square meters of a site for G housing development project, the main purpose of which is to develop the site for 46,000 square meters and build the apartment houses of 46,000 households; the construction traffic department announced the designation of a housing site development district on July 21, 2006; the residents of residential buildings relocated due to the implementation of such public works resided in the planned housing site as part of relocation measures for the tenants of residential buildings who resided in the planned housing site for at least three months; and those who did not have resided in the housing site for not more than one year prior to the date of public inspection in the case of illegal buildings, were entitled to receive compensation rights from 2080 square meters.

[2] In February 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the I restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H around February 2013, the victim J (SJ 42) was entitled to possess a vinyl house in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul; and (b) at the Seoul Metropolitan Government SH Corporation, the Defendant would accommodate the said K and sell the leased apartment.

D It would be possible to get the right to move into the rental apartment on the face of the State.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the plastic houses installed by the defendant in K are installed without permission in September 2012 after the date of the public inspection announcement, so even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, the right to move into the rental house is allowed.

arrow