logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 06. 23. 선고 2015두39576 판결
(심리불속행) 주식양도 후 명의미개서하고 허위양도계약서 작성 등에 공모한 행위는 사기·기타 부정한 행위에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu41048 ( October 13, 2015)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2012west 3149 ( December 26, 2012)

Title

(B) An act of entering the name of a person after the transfer of shares and soliciting the preparation, etc. of a false transfer contract constitutes fraud or other unlawful act.

Summary

(2)The purpose of this study is to clarify the change of ownership after the transfer of shares for the purpose of tax evasion. In order to conceal the title trust relationship, it has been significantly difficult to impose and collect taxes due to the preparation of a false sales contract, active participation or solicitation in false payment, false report of capital gains tax, and it is reasonable to apply 10 years of the exclusion period of imposition in case of tax evasion by fraudulent or other unlawful acts.

Related statutes

The exclusion period for national tax assessment under Article 26-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Article 2 (Gift Tax Taxables) of Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2015Du39576

Plaintiff-Appellee

KoreaA

Defendant-Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

on 13, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

on October 23, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Although the lower judgment was examined in light of the records of this case, it is recognized that the assertion on the grounds of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Procedure

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow