1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant on July 8, 2015 on the lease of 200,000,000, and the period from August 9, 2015 to August 8, 2017 (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case"). The plaintiff entered into an agreement on the lease contract of this case with the defendant around August 14, 2016 to 00,000,000 won among detached housing and neighborhood living facilities with the fourth floor of reinforced concrete structure in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter "real estate of this case") for the lease of 40,000,000,000 won among the deposit money of this case (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case") with the defendant during the period from 00,000,000 won to 10,0005,000 won per annum of this case.

2. The judgment of the defendant on the plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff destroyed the door of the entrance and exit of the real estate of this case and caused damages to the defendant for replacement of the door of the entrance and exit of 300,000 won (including the exit equipment of 150,000 won) and the water rate of 150,000 won, and the water rate of 34,000 won, the water rate of 58,200 won, the water rate of 40,000 won used by the plaintiff in the real estate of this case did not pay 50,000 won, so the above amount of 582,200 won (=30,000 won) is deducted from the balance of deposit amount of 50,000 won, which is the sum of 150,000 won (34,200 won, 58,200 won, 40,000 won).