1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 20, 2009, the Plaintiff leased from the Defendant a deposit of KRW 30,000 from the first floor room of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu D Housing at KRW 30,000, and around that time, paid the above deposit to the Defendant.

B. On August 20, 2012, the Plaintiff was a director at a different place.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1-12, purport of whole pleadings]

2. Assertion and determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The defendant returned only 25,500,000 won out of the lease deposit, and the remaining 4,500,00 won from the remainder of the 4,500,000 won was set off by the plaintiff, and the sewage district was set off, and 4,000,000 won was unilaterally deducted from 5,000 won as the cost of irrigation, and 50,000 won as the cost of irrigation, and did not return it. Even though the defendant was able to injure the 300,000 won at the time of the lease, the plaintiff was not able to avoid doing so, and even if the crime prevention window was required for installation, the defendant did not pay it to the plaintiff the above 4,84,000 won, the balance of the deposit amount of 4,500,000 won and the remainder of the deposit amount of 200,000 won and damages for delay of 200,000 won.

On May 2009, the defendant brought about KRW 463,50 in the middle of 2009, and tried to build a board and a ship ship. The crime prevention windows are established individually for the needs of the plaintiff.

B. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements Nos. 4-12 and 6-2, the Defendant shall bring about KRW 400,000, supra, around August 2012.