Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On November 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated in the title “Real Estate Lease Agreement” as “No. 15 square meters of a building located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the owner E of the building under the following conditions at the mutual influence office located in the Dong-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-do; (b) stated in the title “Real Estate Lease Agreement” as “No. 15 square meters of a building located in Chungcheongnam-do; and (c) the owner E of the building as the owner of the building under the following conditions; (d) the lease period: 15 square meters of the office use; (b) the lease period between November 20, 2014; (c) the free use; (iv) the lessor D; (I); (iv) the lessee; (vii); (vii); and (d) the representative director of the building located in the name of the lessor; and (d) prepared to output the building under the name of the lessor “E” and the name of the lessor “E” in advance.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of a real estate lease agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising the right, and around that time, upon reporting the establishment of the corporation F to the Daejeon Tax Office corporate tax office and the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the Daejeon Jung-dong, the Defendant issued a forged real estate lease agreement as if it was a document duly formed.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. A real estate lease agreement;
1. A certified copy of the corporate registry;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of an agreement on real estate trade and a copy thereof;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Article 234 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment, including the fact that the economic benefit or loss suffered by the defendant is not significantly sustained by the victim due to the crime of this case