logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.08.04 2015고정381
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of BKaman car.

On August 27, 2014, around 11:03, the Defendant transported passengers without cargo from the front of the Dongcheon Apartment apartment located in Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Seoul, to the front of the Eup Eup of Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, the Defendant received KRW 5,000 and provided the said car for commercial transport, and around 11:03, October 11, 2014, the Defendant transported passengers without cargo from the front of the Dongcheon apartment located in Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Dongcheon-gu, Seoul to the extent that the said car is to be used for commercial transport with KRW 3,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each description in a report on commercial transport (by August 27, 2014) and a report on commercial transport (by October 11, 2014);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes stating comprehensive descriptions of vehicles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting a crime and the latter part of Article 90 subparagraph 1 of the Passenger Transport Service Act (Appointment of fines for each type of passenger transport business) [the gist of prosecution by the prosecutor is that the defendant committed an act in the form of passenger transport business by providing his/her business-use trucks to the passenger transport service without cargo two times for consideration, and Articles 90 subparagraph 8 and 81 (1) of the Passenger Transport Service Act stated in the indictment as applicable provisions of the law are punished for acts such as providing private cars for commercial transport, and the indictment is erroneous in the indictment, and the defendant is deemed to have recognized the above facts charged, and since the defendant does not give substantial disadvantage to the defendant'

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow