logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.05.16 2013고정341
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the driver of B, 6 B, and B, one-time cargo vehicle.

1. On May 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 18:53 on May 16, 2012, the Defendant: (b) transported passengers without cargo using B call-based cargo vehicles from the same dong apartment located in Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-si; (c) received KRW 3,000 as transportation expenses; and (d) operated passenger transport business type.

2. On May 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 12:53 on May 19, 2012, the Defendant: (b) carried passengers without cargo using B call Ban bom bom boms in front of the office located in Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu; and (c) received KRW 4,000 as transportation cost and received 4,000 as passenger transport business type.

3. On July 3, 2012, around 14:44, the Defendant: (a) transported passengers who do not possess cargo using a cargo vehicle from the south-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do to the new village of the same Gu; (b) received 5,000 won at the transport cost; and (c) operated passenger transport business type by receiving 5,00 won at the transport cost.

4. On July 10, 2012, at around 12:21, the Defendant: (a) transported passengers who do not have cargo using B B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on commercial transport activities;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning comprehensive shop taxes to vehicles;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and subparagraph 1 of Article 90 of the Passenger Transport Service Act that choose a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are recognized to be erroneous by the defendant; the criminal records and relation of the defendant; the frequency of the crimes in this case; the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant.

arrow