logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.10.13 2017고단1416
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On November 7, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, and on July 21, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment at the Chuncheon Prison on April 22, 2012.

[2] The Defendant, along with C, D’s Buddhist boxes (hereinafter “D”), E’s Buddhist boxes (hereinafter “E”), and the head of the office for women with no name (hereinafter “person with no name”) planned to supply a small amount of fishery products on several occasions at the first time and settle the price in cash, and then to supply a large amount of fishery products on credit and to dispose of the said products on credit and acquire them by fraud by means of dumping and not paying the price.

Accordingly, the Defendant established the “F” of the fishery products wholesale and retail chain for the purpose of committing the crime on May 2012, and took part in the role of responding victims and managing the funds at the office, and the C, D, E, and nameless victims shared their respective roles to receive the victims from the supply of fishery products and to dispose of them.

around June 2012, the Defendant and C wish to make a transaction with the victim G by telephone. The Defendant and C wish to make a transaction with the victim’s opinion, and around that time, at the F Office located in the Northern-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the victim’s children, I would pay the price for the supply of fishery products without the mold.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant received fishery products from the injured party and disposed of them as dumping, and planned to use them at will, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price for fishery products to the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received fishery products, such as misunderstanding the total market value of KRW 37,500,000 from the victim, and acquired them through deceptions, etc., as well as from around that time to August 2012.

arrow