Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2020, at around 03:13, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported at the main point of the trade name, “C” located on the third floor of the building B in Silung-si, which read “C sells alcoholic beverages to minors at the main point of the building B; and (b) taken a trial expense on the ground that the police officer assigned to the police officer E, who was a police officer of the Silung Police Station D police box, did not wear a gark; and (c) on the ground that the above police officer did not take proper measures at the site, the Defendant took a bath to the above police officer; (d) took a bath to the above police officer on the ground that the police officer did not take proper measures at the site; and (e) was notified by hand that he could be arrested from the above F as a flagrant offender of obstruction of performance of official duties; and (e) was arrested and arrested.”

In addition, the defendant knee keling on the floor of the defendant knee kneeling the above F with hand hand on the above F, continuously discarded his cell phone by continuously throwing his cell phone on the floor, throwing away his cell phone, keeping the chest part of the above E with the hand, and continuously pushed the chest part of the above F.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the mobilization and treatment of the above police officers F and E 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the police statement G to the Defendant’s legal statement concerning F, the investigation report of E’s written statement (facam image analysis), attached (8 copies of a facam facam facam facam facam facam), investigation report (Cram facam analysis), attached (4 copies of a cam fa

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act do not mean that the degree of assault on selective fines for punishment under Article 40 and Article 50 of the same Act is not easy, and the circumstances after the arrest are not good. However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed while the defendant was under consultation due to mental problems, such as that the defendant suffers from depression, and that the emotional remedy is serious and lacks the ability to cope with stress situations.