logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.08.11 2016고정276
절도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won;

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 3, 2015, the Defendant attached E number plates removed from D’s Traclers on the street in front of the C apartment in the Chungcheong-si, Chungcheong-si using strawners connected to his FF freight vehicles.

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to December 4, 2015, operated FF freight vehicles with the above number plate attached at the jutesan and Cheongju, and used the car registration number plate unlawfully.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement corresponding thereto in the police statement protocol related to G;

1.The original register, photograph, and consignment management contract (the unlawful use of the vehicle registration number plate as provided in Article 71 of the Automobile Management Act is made by a person who is not authorized to use the vehicle registration number plate which is duly made, whether or not:

Inasmuch as the Defendant’s attachment of a registration number plate on a motor vehicle to another motor vehicle as above constitutes an act of causing the general public to mislead the identity of the motor vehicle, it constitutes an unlawful use of the registration number plate on the motor vehicle itself (see Supreme Court Decision 2006Do5233, Sept. 28, 2006, etc.). The application of the law applies to the case where the Defendant’s attachment of a registration number plate on a motor vehicle to another motor vehicle constitutes an unlawful use of the registration number plate

1. Article 78 Subparag. 2 and Article 71(1) of the former Automobile Management Act (Amended by Act No. 13686, Dec. 29, 2015) on criminal facts

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order was that the Defendant, as a branch borrower, sold He Trrrrrrr to D, purchased a middle strrrrrr and then intended to use the above numberr with a new purchase of a new strrrrrrrrr, and the progress of the procedure (the number plate should be transferred through each affiliated company) was delayed, and the Defendant was a new purchase from D (hereinafter “the instant number plate”).

arrow