logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.21 2018누74008
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing this case, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following items to the fourth and second parts of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Additional Contents] According to Section 4, Section 34 of the Guidelines for International Protection prepared by the United Nations Refugee Agency, the Plaintiff is responsible to prove that it is appropriate for the person who has the right to decide refugee status to review the migration in the relevant case (Evidence 6), and that the vulnerable country index of Liberia in 2018 accounts for the 30th day before the world (the 92.6th day of the vulnerable country index 93.2, the 28th day of the 20199), etc., which is similar to North Korea (Evidence 5-1, the 5th day of the 5th day of the 5th day of the 5th day of the 5th day of the 1st day of the 93th day of the 5th day of the 4th day of the 1st day of the 196th day of the 1st day of the 196th day of the 196th day of the 196th day of the 1st day of the 20th day of the 5th day of the

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow