logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.08.28 2018누47747
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following addition to the text of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the 5th sentence of the first instance judgment, the following contents are added to the following 3th sentence. [In the case of Liberia, the plaintiff asserts that there is a high possibility of gambling due to a change of traditional religion, which is frighten in accordance with the region, and on this basis, that the confidential society where overseas journalists have actually cruel consciousness and consciousness are located in Liberia. However, even though the facts pertaining to the confidential society of the above literary works are true, it is difficult to view that the actual threat of such confidential group has been caused to the plaintiff who was living in Liberia's water source and living in Liberia.] Under the 6th sentence of the first instance judgment, the plaintiff added the following contents to the following 5th sentence only on the ground that it is very weak that Liberian's vulnerable index is very high (A. 5 evidence) in the case of Liberia's confidential society (A. 6) and that it cannot be readily concluded that the plaintiff's private authority did not have a high function to provide it to Liberia's private authorities.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow