1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional parts, thereby citing it pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

The following shall be added to the 4th 6th 6th son of the first instance judgment:

[Plaintiff’s weak state index in 2018 was considerably higher than that of North Korea (93.2) (No. 1, 2, and 3 of the evidence A) and there is no possibility of being protected by governmental authority or being tried fairly. The Plaintiff asserted that it is difficult to escape from persecution even if the Plaintiff was forced to go back to other areas because the flutinium to which the Plaintiff belongs is the largest population is the part of the flusium, but the materials submitted by the Plaintiff alone cannot be readily concluded to have reached the degree that it is difficult to resolve the problem through the protection of the government and judicial agencies or alternative migration to other regions, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s above assertion)

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.