logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.01.16 2013고정1214
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant leased the second floor of the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Victim C(69 years old), and there was a fact that there was a dispute over the victim and 3-4 times with the victim referred to the fact that there was a brush or strush in the process of spreading food waste on the said rooftop.

On May 8, 2013, at around 10:05, the Defendant expressed to the above victim the reasons why food waste is laid on the rooftop in the ward of the second floor above, namely, “I see why I am flap gu head dyp dyp? dyp, I am head by fyp, and kid the chest part of the chest. I am fyp and fyp 2 dyp dyp, which require approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. Each damaged photograph (the sequence 4,5 of the evidence lists);

1. Two copies of a photograph (the No. 11 of the evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of medical records;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant alleged that there was no fact that he committed a crime in the judgment of conviction and sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the defendant in the second floor. However, the victim's crime can be established in the judgment in full view of the following: (a) the fact that he did not have committed a crime in the judgment of the defendant in the second floor; (b) the defendant was suffering from heavy water in order to reduce head; (c) the main electronic lid is far away from the entrance of the entrance; (d) the victim stated that the defendant was faced with the main electronic and suffered image; (e) the victim suffered from image; and (e) the victim was her chest due to her head; (e) the video side spread relatively wide on each bridge; (e) D slope, a police officer, arrived immediately after the instant case; and (e) the victim took a photograph of the victim's bodily injury.

The reason for sentencing is health team, the victim suffered from the injury that was not somewhat weak due to the instant case, the damage was not recovered, and the circumstances and crimes of the instant crime.

arrow