logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.04.11 2017고단6283
업무상과실치상
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who sells an apartment complex, roasting, and net roasting.

On May 30, 2016, around 17:30, the Defendant: (a) installed a simple kitchen in the apartment complex C in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si; and (b) prepared and sold a roasting, roasting, roasting, and offered hot water together with a coffee at the right corner of the above kitchen.

As such, a person who prepares food, etc. in a simple outdoor cooking room and provides customers with heavy food and drink in the seats, has a duty of care to install a cooking tool in a safe place, and manage them so that he/she or customers do not lead up the same to the customers.

Nevertheless, the Defendant installed a coffee set up in the vicinity of the simple kitchen and the right side of the sales stand, and neglected the management of heavy water, neglected to do so, caused the Defendant to go beyond the above coffee set in the direction of the victim E (4 years) who roassing the instant coffee, and suffered double images of 14% of the physical surface of the number of days of treatment because hot water has been accumulated into the victim, which caused the victim to suffer from 14% of the number of days of treatment.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following facts recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, it is difficult to believe that the witness witness witness witness witness testimony, accusation, and police testimony protocol against D is insufficient.

1) D made a statement to the effect that “The victim’s hands on his own left hand was the victim’s hand, but it was a report on the flow of water beyond a coffee, and that it would not go up to the end following the victim’s hand.”

If we consider that the victim suffered images not only on the left side of the body but also on the hand hand hand of the victim, D is judged not to have taken the victim (if D has taken the victim's hand, D suffered pictures such as the left hand hand of D.

arrow