The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment may take into account circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case as well as the agreement with the victim D, but there is no change of circumstances that could reduce the sentence of the court below in the trial. The defendant left the main electronics containing heavy water to the victim D, and the crime of this case is not very good. Although the defendant voluntarily surrenders to investigation agency on May 11, 2007, the defendant does not respond to the trial for a very long time after the second trial date of the court below, but can have been punished for the same kind of assault, the fact that the defendant could have been punished for the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victim F, H, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the court below's punishment is judged to be appropriate and it is not recognized that the above defendant's assertion is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.