A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sought a complaint from the police officers who received a report at the time of vision due to the same day on September 17, 2017, and (b) notified the police officers, such as D, etc., to the extent that the police officers were able to file a civil petition; and (c) notified the police officers, who continued to evade the disturbance, may be punished by the disturbance for cancellation of the state of the government office; and (d) even if the police officers started to take the image of the Defendant to secure evidence, the Defendant could be punished by the disturbance for cancellation of the state of the government office; and (e) if the police officers continue to attack from the police officers, the Defendant was able to be punished by the disturbance for cancellation of the state of the government office; and (e) when the police officers again notified that they could be arrested as the current offender, the Defendant took the Defendant’s hand.

PDA was reduced.

As a result, the Defendant committed violence to a public official who is performing legitimate duties on the prevention of crimes and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographs and motion pictures taken by police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no person [the person who is subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (6 months to one year and six months) of the type 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) [the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence shall be made in consideration of the following circumstances and the defendant's age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the following circumstances, the sentence shall be determined within the scope of recommended punishment according

Unfavorable circumstances: A favorable circumstance that is favorable to the necessity of strict interference with the performance of official duties in order to protect the legitimate performance of official duties of the State and to establish a sound social order: the same crime is committed.