A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daegu High Court on embezzlement, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ansan Prison on June 15, 2013.

1. On August 30, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was found in the D police box located in the Southern-gu, Daegu-si, Daegu-si, and was under the influence of alcohol at around August 27, 2015, and was dissatisfied with the request for cancellation of the state of the government office around August 27, 2015, to E with the assistant belonging to the D police box, who stated the person under the control of the D police box “I write the person under the control of the police box;

It is necessary to do so to do so, i.e., h., n., n.h., n.h., n.h., n.h.

The inside of the house A, the inside of which is the same as life imprisonment.

The country of the Republic of Korea shall be free from death, and the country of the Republic of Korea shall throw away from the death of the people at one time at the inside.

In emphasizing the fact that he/she is a tin-opener, he/she interfered with legitimate execution of duties, such as counseling duties for civil petitioners by a police officer with approximately 20 minutes of a disturbance by avoiding disturbance and threatening slope E.

2. The Defendant who damaged public goods was arrested in a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties by threatening a police officer, as prescribed in paragraph (1), and, on August 30, 2015, according to the Daegu Suwon-gu Punishment around 05:10 on August 30, 2015, the Defendant was placed in the detention room of the 2460 Suwon-gu Police Station with a complaint to the detained person, and was established in the detention room.

lids of toilets change lids by hand, were removed, and the goods used by public offices are damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A criminal investigation report (attractiond trends);

1. Each photograph;

1. A damaged lid picture of a lid;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history and report (verification of the fact that repeated crime is being committed);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the punishment shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes with the punishment imposed on a crime causing damage to public goods heavier than the punishment).