1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for partial revision as follows A and B:

Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as it is.

The following parts of the “2.(c) Recognition” in the judgment of the first instance shall be amended as follows:

The Intervenor filed an application with the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Regional Labor Relations Commission for remedy on June 3, 2013, alleging that the instant suspension order and the Plaintiff’s review decision thereon are unreasonable. On July 29, 2013, most of the instant suspension orders were the same as that of the instant suspension order, which was revoked on June 5, 2012, and on February 4, 2013, the Plaintiff expressed that the Plaintiff would not be subject to any further disciplinary action. As such, it is difficult to view that the instant suspension order and the Plaintiff’s review application constitutes grounds for dismissal of the first instance court’s dismissal of the instant disciplinary order from the first instance court to the first instance court’s dismissal of the instant disciplinary order from the first instance court’s dismissal on the ground that the instant suspension order and the Plaintiff’s review on the ground that the instant suspension order deviates from the discretionary scope of the instant suspension order compared to the degree of flight. 2)

8. As to the grounds for disciplinary action No. 11