1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who runs a wholesale and retail business of livestock products under the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant is a person who runs a wholesale and retail business of meat under the trade name of “D.”

B. On December 3, 2015, the Plaintiff supplied 1,735.26 km (hereinafter “instant case, etc.”) of freezing 10,932,138 Won, such as freezing cream, to the freezing in the store operated by the Defendant.

C. On September 2016, the Defendant consumed approximately KRW 1,000 g in the instant case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, partial entry of Eul evidence 5 (including provisional number), purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff asserted by the parties, the original Defendant continued to engage in the supply of livestock products with the Defendant from August 7, 2015, and supplied the instant case to the Defendant based on the above transactional relationship on December 3, 2015, and accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay the purchase price equivalent to the above in-depth value to the Plaintiff.

The defendant asserts that he was entrusted by the plaintiff with the disposition of this case, etc. on the plaintiff's account, and that he did not purchase it.

B. Determination 1: (a) the following facts and circumstances that can be acknowledged by adding the purport of the entire pleadings to the aforementioned evidence; (b) the Plaintiff supplied 1,267.1kg of freezing, etc. to the Defendant on August 7, 2015; and (c) 3,630.6kg of freezing, etc. on September 12, 2015; and (d) the Defendant paid the goods supplied on five occasions from September 5, 2015 to December 2, 2015; and (e) continued the supply transaction of livestock products between the original Defendant; (b) the Plaintiff supplied the instant case, etc. to the Defendant on December 3, 2015; and (c) issued a statement and statement of transactions thereon; and (d) the Defendant already sold the goods to the Plaintiff, which was the truster; and (e) sold the goods after the lapse of the pertinent disposition.