Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 19, 2019, at a cafeteria located in the 19:04 city of Gyeonggiwon, the Defendant: (a) taken a short flab with the Defendant’s cell phone camera image shooting function; and (b) taken the Defendant’s side opening of the bridge on the name omitted; and (c) taken the 2 victim’s bridge, who was seated on the Defendant’s side table.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of a person who could cause sexual humiliation or shame against the will of the person to be taken.

2. On May 7, 2019, at around 13:36, the Defendant, at the front of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2 and Ccafeteria D store, carried out a short flamer by using the mobile camera image shooting function of the mobile phone devices owned by the Defendant, and taken the front of the Defendant’s name in front of the victim’s bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of a person who could cause sexual humiliation or shame against the will of the person to be taken.

3. On June 12, 2019, at around 12:29, the Defendant, at the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, taken a short flamera screen function of mobile phone images owned by the Defendant, and taken a bridge on the front of the Defendant’s name unclaimed victim’s 2 bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of a person who could cause sexual humiliation or shame against the will of the person to be taken.

Examining the evidence in light of the relevant legal principles (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do7007, Sept. 25, 2008; Supreme Court Decision 2015Do16851, Jan. 14, 2016), each image of the crime in the holding reveals the part of the bridge of the victims, which appears through the table table below (see, e.g., Paragraph (1) of this Article), and the part of the body of the victim, which is taken by the students who suffered short school uniforms, centering on the ambur and the lower half (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 208Do7007, Sept. 25, 2008; 2015Do16851, Sept. 14, 2016).