1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. From October 2, 2014, the Plaintiff, an oriental medical doctor, started to receive bedclothes treatment on the right part of the oriental medical clinic operated by the Defendant, from around October 2, 2014. On October 21, 2014, the Plaintiff received surgery on the right part of the Plaintiff’s oriental medical doctor, to have knee kne, in addition to the bedclothes treatment of the right part of the Plaintiff received from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

The Defendant’s medicinal dys used by the injection containing 0.1cc of liquid powder containing red and wale, etc., for the relaxation of pain and the treatment of sule infections.

After the instant procedure, the Plaintiff said that it is difficult for the Defendant to view knee and kneee to the right side. On November 26, 2014, at an external hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the Dansan Hospital with Madro-flue and Madro-flue persium (hereinafter “instant injury”). The Plaintiff received medical treatment for the said injury at the hospital and Ulsan National University Hospital.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries or images, and the purport of the whole pleadings, as stated in Gap's Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Defendant’s negligence Plaintiff, as the instant medical procedure, went through a large number of skins in the part of the instant medical procedure. After the instant medical procedure, the Plaintiff got off from the bed and got off on the right bridge, and became kneeee in the floor.

Even after being in a state of being unable to walk down knee-knee-knee-kne-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

Before the instant procedure, there is no fact that the Plaintiff received treatment on the right knee-free side or suffered damage to the anti-monthly.

Therefore, the plaintiff's injury of this case occurred after the defendant's treatment of this case or after the above procedure. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the injury.

B. The defendant's violation of the duty to explain is the effect of treatment of the drug intrusion on the plaintiff before conducting the instant treatment.