1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,354,074 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 5, 2012 to September 7, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 10, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the upper right-free aggregate in a traffic accident, and received “the blood static surgery and internal surgery using metal plates and balles, along with the transplant of a balone,” from the “Defendant Hospital” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) on June 13, 2011

(hereinafter referred to as “first operation”). (b)

The Plaintiff, at the Defendant Hospital on March 2, 2012, taken a radioactive photograph on the right-hand sloping, and received “the metal board and bridge removal” on March 5, 2012.

(hereinafter referred to as “second operation”). (c)

On August 7, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the state of fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoralsium at B Hospital” and on August 10, 2015, “the third surgery” was performed with fluoral fluoral transplantation using metal plates and

3) The Defendant 1 was hospitalized for 13 days. The Defendant 1 was hospitalized for 13 days. The Defendant 1 had no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entry of evidence Nos. 1 to 5

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The gist of the party’s assertion 1) Plaintiff 2 was as follows: (a) Defendant 2 had received the third operation since 3 years and 5 months from the date of the second operation; and (b) had not received any treatment for “influent aggregate.”

After the second operation, the Plaintiff was not due to the lack of evidence.

Therefore, the total natural oil was normally performed after the second operation, and the total of oil was caused by other external causes, so there was no negligence in the defendant's second operation.

In addition, the defendant fully explained about the second alcohol.

B. The result of the expert C’s appraisal of medical records is as follows.

After one year from the ordinary framework operation, metal-resistant scrap removal shall be carried out.

In order to decide whether to perform the removal, the first consideration is required, and there is a cinematographic opinion that the aggregate oil has been restored to the strength that can withstanding normal action after the removal.