A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 11:00 on January 18, 2013, the Defendant brought 150,000 won in cash 1.5 million won, driver’s license, one resident registration certificate, one modern credit card holder, one list of meeting members, one list of meeting members, one scarb card, etc., which were kept in custody of 5,00 won in cash.

2. From around 11:00 on January 21, 2013 to around 11:50, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by bringing one of the victim E-owned cash 70,000 won; (b) one driver’s license; (c) one resident registration certificate; and (d) two credit cards; and (c) one of the instant market price for MF male male workers, which is equivalent to KRW 180,00,000.

3. The Defendant, around 12:00 on January 29, 2013, brought a theft of KRW 100,000,000 in cash owned by the victim F, which was kept in custody at the D male escape room No. 39 in the same way and in the same manner.

4. On March 14, 2013, around 19:30 on March 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) cut off a cash of 300,000 U.S. dollars 2, U.S. dollars 2; (b) one resident registration certificate; and (c) one wall containing one driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of H, C, E, and F;

1. Photographs photographs of the suspect after the crime;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. The photograph of a slid, etc. and each seized photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of damaged articles);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 333(1) of the Return Criminal Procedure Act, even though he had been sentenced twice to a fine due to the same kind of crime, is again subject to each of the instant cases.