The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the above judgment is publicly notified.

Around 16:45 on March 9, 2012, the Defendant, at the entrance of the Sinpo-gun Port Project Bureau of the Sinpo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, a group of people opposing the construction project of the Sinpo-Gun Port Complex, obstructed the passage of the vehicle by holding out the opposite rescue, and interfered with the passage of the vehicle. A police officer D, who belongs to the 6 dong-gu, the 6 dong-si, a group of police agencies, used to collect evidence of this situation, was assaulted by the camcos from the demonstration unit where his name cannot be known, and cam the above camcos around the bottom.

At the entrance of the above project team, the Defendant was unable to observe the above situation, and went back to the military after leaving the above camping cam from the bottom near the floor, and the cam cam cam cam cambling with E in the reduction of the fourth unit register of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency, and requested the reduction cam cam cam cam cambling, without complying with this request, it was up to approximately 100 meters away from the main entrance to the main entrance of the public-military complex-military complex tourist port located near the above site at approximately 100 meters away from the above site, and damaged the above cam cam to go back to the opposite f.10,000 won of the repair cost.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the camping cam, which is evidence collection equipment of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency managed by D police officers.

Maz.

1. The expression "an intention of unlawful acquisition necessary for the establishment of larceny" refers to an intention to use or dispose of another person's property, such as his/her own property, in accordance with its economic usage (Supreme Court Decision 2000Do3655 Decided October 13, 200). Meanwhile, in a criminal trial, criminal facts must be based on strict evidence with probative value, which makes it difficult for a judge to have a reasonable doubt. Thus, in a case where the prosecutor's proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction is to be achieved, the defendant's assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.