logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.01.14 2015나10988
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. Text 1-A of the judgment of the first instance; and

(b).

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 9, 9, 10, 4, 14, 14, 2, 14, 2, 4, 4, 4, 4, 14 "from September 25, 2014," and "from September 26, 2014, 3, 17, through 11, 4, 3, 17, and 4, 10, 4, 10, 10, 4, etc., of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited by the main sentence of the Civil Procedure Act:

2. The following circumstances are: ① there is a large reservoir around the land in this case, and the Defendant has planned and implemented a project to install the large reservoir by purchasing the surrounding land, etc. from around 1966, ② even before the Defendant installed a retaining wall on the land in this case, it appears that the Plaintiff could have been able to have been able to have installed the above retaining wall at least in the place where the retaining wall was installed, ③ the water flow of the land in this case, ③ the water way can be installed according to the increase in the quantity of the large reservoir or the water flow according to the increase in the quantity of the large reservoir or the water flow of the above land, and depending on the circumstances, the size of the appraisal of the retaining wall can be installed at least 60,000,000,000 won of the above land before the installation of the retaining wall at least 60,000,000 won of the land in this case.

arrow