1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except where the defendant added the following judgments to the fourth 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 4th 4th 19th 4th 19th 4th 4th 19th 20

2. The defendant asserts that the owner of the land of this case B was P, and the defendant purchased the above land from P. P. According to each of the statements in evidence Nos. 15 through 17, the defendant asserts that the above land was purchased from P. The fact that the owner of the above land was stated P in the "written report of land purchase site" prepared by Leecheon-gun (Ycheon-gun, Leecheon-gun, to purchase the land for the construction project of the government-managed reservoir at the time of May 1969) is recognized, but there is no evidence as to how the ownership of the land was transferred to P, since the plaintiff's prior price was written in the internal document of the government office, it is insufficient to conclude that P is the owner of the above land, and there is no other evidence to support this.

The defendant's assertion on this part is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.