logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2020.04.23 2019고단1377
공문서위조등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be five years of imprisonment.

Seized evidence referred to in subparagraphs 6 and 7 shall be confiscated.

evidence of seizure.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 20, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on January 30, 2007, sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on April 8, 201, sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on April 8, 201, and on November 28, 2014, sentenced to five years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on August 26, 2019.

"2019 Highest 1377"

1. At around 20:00 on September 2, 2019, the Defendant forged public document: (a) the paper purchased from a 14th floor of “B hotel in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, with an identification card size attached a photograph to the Defendant’s identification card; (b) the Defendant posted the Defendant’s identification card on the upper end of the site of the “Seoul Central Police Station,” which was removed from the front section for police publicity, with the Defendant’s marking on the front section of the site; and (c) the Defendant used the composite machine purchased from the Seoul MU electronic shop at the lower end of the site, with the Defendant inscribed the “police” and then downloaded the official document, one copy of the identification card purchased from the Seoul MU electronic shop. On October 12:50, 2019, the Defendant forged the official document, which was a public official identification card for the purpose of exercising the official document.

3. The Defendant, who is a public official qualification-based public official, moved to E at the date, time, at the place, as described in Paragraph 2, in a manner described in Paragraph 1, and exercised his authority by falsely misrepresenting the police officer’s qualification who is a public official in a voluntary manner, even though he was not a police officer, “B is similar to a suspect who is a police officer, and is found in the Republic of Korea.”

4. Paragraph (2) shall apply to the Defendant who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

arrow