Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] On January 13, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Suwon Giwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 21, 2016.
[ criminal facts] The defendant was promoted with his father F while he was aware of the victim E who had been operating a civil engineering enterprise through his husband for about 15 years before the defendant was committed with his father F
In the reconstruction process of the G Building, the unpaid rental deposit and F had the victim borrow money in order to prepare the apartment sales price to be residing.
The defendant 2013
1. On the first and second day, “G building reconstruction business will begin soon and need money to be paid to the victim by telephone at a non-permanent and non-permanent place.” If the victim lends KRW 300 million to the victim as the money is needed to operate the business.
In addition, civil engineering works during the reconstruction works of G building will be implemented.
“False speech” was made.
However, unlike originally anticipated, the Defendant failed to secure project financing, and the selection of the re-building project was not carried out smoothly. On May 2012, at the time of commencement of the re-building project, the Defendant failed to refund the lease deposit deposit to the lessee at approximately KRW 70-8 billion by the date of promise to terminate the re-building contract with the lessee which was leased in the G building, and there was no intention or ability to repay the said re-building deposit to the lessee, and even if the said re-building project was made by the date of promise, some lessees did not request a voluntary auction on January 2, 2013, and the decision to commence the auction was issued on January 2, 2013, and the financial institution loans, etc. up to KRW 70-8 billion each month, and thus, the progress of the re-building project was extremely poor, and thus, even if the said re-building project was made from the damaged party, there was no intention or ability to repay the deposit to the victim of the said G re-building project.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he/she is suffering from the damage.