(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.07 2016고단9174

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.07 2016고단9174

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant pays 30,000,000 won to the applicant by fraud.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2015, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel 1202 in Seocho-gu, the Defendant: (a) made it difficult for the Victim C to perform the reconstruction project and approved the reconstruction project by using force to implement the development of modern industries in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City EM”) from 2006; (b) received a contract for the removal of the reconstruction site and civil engineering works from the head of the association; (c) made it possible for the Plaintiff to receive the orders for removal and civil engineering works; and (d) made a written approval for the approval of the head of the association; and (d) made a false statement on the written approval of the head of the association; and (e) made a false statement on the written approval of the head of the association; and (e) made it possible to request KRW 30 million in the name of the non-funds.”

However, the defendant did not play any role in the process of a reconstruction project to select modern industrial development. It was thought that the defendant would use part of the money suffered from the defendant who instructed the creditor F to demand repayment from the creditor F to the defendant, and did not intend to use it as the street funds to the head of the reconstruction association. Even if the head of the reconstruction association did not receive the money from the damaged party due to the lack of the contract for removal and civil engineering works, there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to take the removal and civil engineering works due to the reconstruction project.

Around July 30, 2015, the Defendant received a letter of KRW 28,00,000 from the injured party’s officetel, and received KRW 2,00,000 from the Defendant’s bank account to the Defendant’s bank account on the same day, and received KRW 30,000 from the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, and C;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Each letter of understanding, each certificate of borrowing, E.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.10 2015고단2912

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.05.12 2015고단3469

-의정부지방법원 2017.07.31 2016고단5042

-서울동부지방법원 2017.01.18 2016고단3114

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.22 2016고단1497