A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 27, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of destroying property, at the center of “F” operated by the victim E (W, 39 years old) located in Gangnam-si (F) around 23:55 on September 27, 2016, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by putting one beer fump equivalent to KRW 990 at the market price located in the same place, putting him/her over his/her hand, thereby damaging the victim’s property.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and the victim’s injury at the date, time, place, and place described in the above 1.1. Report and sent out after the 112 report to the Ha (35. Doh) of the Gyeongung Police Station G G District of Gangnam Police Station called “Is the brue of the brue, the brue of the brue, the brue of the brue, the brue of the brue H three times by hand, and the brue of the bru

It is not that it will be involved, but that you want to "I am out," and salute it, and then I resist to arrest the defendant as a current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties, and I am unfolded the defendant as a wall.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers with respect to the prevention and suppression of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim I, such as fingers, grandchildren, and other saves that need to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Each written statement of E and J;

1. Each investigation report (related to attachment of any site photograph, etc. and any written estimate);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on medical certificate and receipt of medical expenses;

1. A point of destruction of property as stated in the relevant legal provision concerning facts constituting an offense: A point of obstructing the performance of official duties as stated in the judgment of Article 366 of the Criminal Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the punishment provided for in the judgment of the court below shall be imposed on the crimes of bodily injury as stated in the judgment of the most severe punishment among the crimes provided for in paragraph (2) of the judgment of the court below);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The punishment provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the sum of the long-term punishments of two crimes as indicated in the holding) is more severe.