logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012. 04. 25. 선고 2011누39860 판결
일시적으로 1주택과 1조합원입주권을 소유하게 된 경우로 보기 어려움[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 201Guhap6265 ( October 13, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

National Tax Service Review and Transfer 2011-0033 (Law No. 12, 2011)

Title

It is difficult to see cases of temporary possession of one house and one association member's relocation right.

Summary

(The same as the judgment of the court of first instance) since the association member's relocation right converted from the apartment is acquired as the apartment house is authorized as the apartment house is owned and the apartment house is authorized, it is difficult to regard the case of temporarily owning two houses until the one house comes to possess one association member's relocation right.

Related statutes

Article 89 of the Income Tax Act

Article 104 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2011Nu39860 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

XX

Defendant, Appellant

Head of Central Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court Decision 201Guhap6265 Decided October 13, 2011

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 28, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

April 25, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition of imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 000 on December 6, 2010 against the plaintiff on December 6, 201 shall be revoked.

Reasons

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow