1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal shall be the first instance.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the amended part and the part concerning which the plaintiff additionally claims in the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Portion] The portion causing death during the 3rd 8th 8th 2nd 3rd 8th 8th 2006 is deleted.

The evidence of the above 3rd 20 E and evidence of the “A” No. 4, “B” shall be added to the right side of the 3rd 20th e.g.

Part 4, “A’s each statement on the right side of the evidence of heading 5 through 7 is insufficient to recognize it, and otherwise add “A’s each statement on the right side of the evidence of heading 5 through 7.”

The 4th parallels 19 to 5th parallels shall be done in the following manner:

C) The medical record appraisal at the first instance trial presented the opinion that “the causes of the outbreak of cerebral typhism shall be combined with various risk factors, and the risk factor shall have high blood pressure, urology, dynassis, dynassis, smoking, etc.”

According to the medical records of C Hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s medical records, the Plaintiff’s medical records verified that the Plaintiff smoked from 0.5 to 15 years a day. According to the general health examination results of the Plaintiff’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s medical records, the Plaintiff was determined as “high blood pressure or urine disease (subject to secondary examination)” and “here-patient’s disease (high blood pressure)” in 2015, and “here-patient’s disease (high blood pressure)” in 2018. According to the Plaintiff’s health insurance records, the Plaintiff’s medical records showed that the Plaintiff received medical records from the Plaintiff’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s 170m/ 19m high from the Plaintiff’s blood pressure after May 2015, and the Plaintiff’s medical records showed that the Plaintiff’s blood pressure was 90m high from the Plaintiff’s instant hospital’s 17.3m.