logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2021.01.14 2020구단56172
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 2019, when the Plaintiff (B) was in office as a public educational official, he/she was issued as C High School and was on duty as a school teacher. On May 13, 2019, the Plaintiff (B) was used in the school room at around 08:45, and was provided treatment in the D hospital after being discharged from the D hospital. Since then, the E hospital was diagnosed at the E hospital as “the brain scopic scopic scopic scoptyphism, mythic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic, primary scopic scopic scopic, primary scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scop

B. On October 15, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an application for approval of medical care for official duties with the superintendent of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office of Education, which is the head of an institution dealing with the instant injury and disease, stating each of the instant injury and disease as the injury and disease. However, on February 11, 2020, the Defendant continued to concentrate excessive tasks beyond the general and ordinary scope with respect to the Plaintiff.

As it is difficult to see that there is no substantial causal relationship between official duties and the injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury in the instant case, a disposition of non-approval for medical care for official duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”) was rendered.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The attachment to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as follows;

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was as follows: (a) the Plaintiff worked at F High Schools from December 2014 to February 2019, while serving in F High Schools; (b) the Plaintiff, other than the duties as F High School teachers, was assigned to G High School teachers (2015 to 2017) and the head of the Information Department (2015), the head of the school affairs (2016 and 2017), the head of the Counseling Welfare Department (2017), and the head of the Counseling Welfare Department (2018), together with occupational tasks and stress accumulated; and (c) C High School was assigned to the position of a teacher in the third year and continued occupational tasks and stress.

Each of the instant injury and disease is caused by such physical and mental burden, and is the Plaintiff’s disease.

arrow