logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.09.12 2018누38200
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. On July 1, 2016, the Defendant issued an approval for the first medical treatment with respect to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as admitting the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part of the judgment of the court of first instance) unless the relevant part of the judgment in the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance

2. On the two pages of the amendment, the Plaintiff, as a daily worker of B, engaged in tamping work at the site of the signal system, Inc., Ltd., the signal system construction site located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on February 5, 2016. On February 14, 2016, the Plaintiff carried out an operation of tamping a waterproof screen on the floor surface of the first floor of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the 3 to 6 to 3 to 9 to 3rd, as follows: (a) the Plaintiff’s work of 3 to 3rd, as amended, as follows: (b) the Plaintiff’s work of 1 to 10 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 3rd.

The injury and disease of this case was eventually diagnosed after being discovered after being cherded at around 10:30 and being transferred to a hospital, while removing tapes in part.

2) The Plaintiff’s existing disease and health conditions were men aged 60 (55 years old) at the time of the instant injury, who had detailed unknown urology not accompanied by a merger certificate, detailed unknown salivosiss, and detailed chronic infections, but there was no record of medical treatment related to the Plaintiff’s injury prior to the occurrence of the instant injury on the medical records. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff did not smoke or smoke (non-smoking since 2015).

(iii) medical treatment;

arrow