Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On June 10, 2018, at around 19:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim C’s “D cafeteria” in the operation of the victim C (n, 54 years old); (b) expressed that the victim was “A” and expressed the victim’s desire to “I am, I am, I am, and I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am unable to operate the restaurant by force of the victim.

[2018 Highest 2014] On September 1, 2018, the Defendant received the 112 report that he was satisfing in the vicinity of the G restaurant located in the F G restaurant located in the Southern-gun, and was subject to the control of the police box belonging to the Haung-gun Police Station He, which was called out by the Defendant, from the I, who was the police box belonging to the police box belonging to the Goung-gun Police Station. On the 10 people, including J, there are 10 people, the Defendant insulting the above I against the above security guard.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 1367]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C (2018 highest 2014);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statutes of each police statement protocol to I and J;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 314(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There are many circumstances revealed in the arguments in this case, including the fact that the victim and his/her dependants might have engaged in severe mental impulses by verbal abuse at a place where the victim's age might interfere with his/her duties of sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and that there are many criminal records including the same criminal records. Meanwhile, the fact that the defendant committed a contingent act by taking advantage of his/her personal record, the defendant's reflects the defendant, the defendant's reflects his/her sex, family relationship, environment, the background and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.