Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the defendants are individually from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 1693] D, around 04:00 on September 8, 2015, when working as an employee at the convenience store operated by the victim F in Ansan-si, the victim F, who was employed as an employee, proposed that the friendly arrest and the Defendants and G should be cut back to the convenience store, and then stolen and use the goods at the convenience store, and the Defendants and G accepted it.

Defendant

A and D stored approximately one million won in the above convenience store and about 198,000 won in the display stand, 32 cigarettes, 6 single-use electronic cigarettes, etc. in a bank, and the defendant B and G, who were in compliance with them, have divided the stolen money and valuables, and she also saw the above bank.

Accordingly, the Defendants stolen the victim's property together with D and G.

[2016 Highest 1857]

1. On May 9, 2016, Defendant B, along with G on May 9, 2016, in front of the IEX bicycle riding in the direction of the victim J at the time of the new wall-based Ha, he reported the network to other G, and Defendant B boarded one NEX bicycle riding amounting to KRW 150,000 at the market price owned by the victim.

2. Defendant B, along with G on May 2016, 2016, followed the gap in which the victim’s name was unsatisfed in front of the location of the private house near the K private house in Ansan, and Defendant B went on one of the Lespo MTO bicycles on the market price unsatfined by the victim.

3. Defendant B, along with G on May 2016, 2016, took the seat of the victim’s name in the front of the private house in the city of Ansan, and Defendant B took the seat of the victim, and Defendant B took the seat of Lespo RAVIN bicycle on the market price that is the victim’s ownership.

As a result, Defendant B stolen the victims' property together with G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The police interrogation protocol of the Defendants, D, and G

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of each seizure protocol and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant B)