logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.12.11 2020고단2339
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. Defendant B violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) is a person running “D” in the Seo-gu, Seogbuk-gu and the third floor, and Defendant A is an employee of the said “D”.

The Defendants conspired from January 19, 2020 to February 21, 20200, and conspired to employ employees engaged in sexual traffic, such as E with the fatherland’s nationality, and provided guidance to the male grandchildren who found the above business establishment by receiving KRW 8-130,00 from the male grandchildren who received KRW 8-130,00 in return for sexual traffic, and had them do sexual intercourse with the female employees.

(b) No person who violates the Medical Service Act shall establish a massage place without obtaining a recognition of qualification as a inseminator;

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired and did not obtain the recognition of a massage, but employed the said D business establishment from January 19, 202 to February 13, 2020, including the Plaintiff’s nationality E, etc., and established a massage place by allowing the said employees to take care of the body of the said customers by receiving payment from male customers who found the place.

2. Defendant B

(a) No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, from January 19, 2020 to February 13, 2020, the Defendant entered the said D business establishment as a visa exemption (B-1) and did not have the status of employment and employed status, and employed Thai E whose period of sojourn has expired as female employees.

(b) Any person who violates the Educational Environment Protection Act shall be a business that provides services that may cause physical contacts between unspecified persons, exposure to confidential parts, or other similar acts in an educational environment protection zone to protect the health, sanitation, safety, learning, and educational environment of students.

arrow