Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court's Branch of the Daejeon District Court on January 15, 2010, and was sentenced to a summary order of three million won for the same crime in the same court on October 28, 2013, and on November 5, 2015, the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 13, 2015 after being sentenced to one year of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution.
around 17:20 on October 2, 2016, the Defendant 2262 driven a car without a driver’s license, under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.128% from the front of a restaurant in which the trade name in the south-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City is unknown to the front day of the Southern-gu Chack-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Chack-do to the front day of the Cham Center in 591, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
The Defendant, at around November 13, 2016, at around 18:25, 2016, was a traffic accident at the “E cafeteria” parking lot located in Nam-gu, Southern-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 13, 2016, and 112 reported and sent by G (56 years) to the police box belonging to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Station Fabs, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (56 years old) attempted to ask the Defendant’s first executive officer for the traffic accident and for the measurement of alcohol, and whether the said G “the measurement of why to see” is conducted.
"At the time of drinking, the victim et al. was made once while taking a bath."
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to 112 reporting processing affairs.
On March 13, 2017, the Defendant driven a math truck with approximately 15 meters alcohol level of 0.101% while drunk at around 14:05 on March 13, 2017, the Defendant driven a math truck under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.101% during blood.
Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving at least twice under the influence of alcohol, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.
Summary of Evidence
“The following evidence out of the evidence of 2016 order 2368 of the Act:
1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and reports on the results of confirmation of undispositioned previous conviction;
1. The report of investigation (the suspect is in the period of suspended execution);