logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고단282
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, on January 29, 2016, was on the street in front of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D on January 29, 2016 and carried on the body with Defendant E, who is a child of the Defendant, while serving on the said body, Defendant A’s fight.

Down each other.

“The” reported 112, and sent out to the site and the Defendant avoided E, and assaulted G face with her hand, etc. at one time, by putting a balp of the police station F District of the Songdong Police Station of the Seoul Songdong Police Station, which prevented the Defendant from committing a balping.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of public peace and order by police officers.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the places specified in paragraph (1), arrested a flagrant offender committing a crime of interference with the performance of official duties and takes a bath to G, who tried to drive in the patrol lane, and assaulted G’s chest by tight hand by pushing ahead with his shoulder.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the control of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. The F District Service (Defendant B);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Testimony of witness G, witness H and witness of each part of A;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. He asserts that he will work for the F District (Defendant A’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

However, the testimony of G is consistent with the above facts charged and the witness Hather as a witness of Defendant B was not a serious body fighting, such as fating fat, but there was a physical contact between the Defendant and G, and the credibility of the testimony of the above G can be acknowledged.

Therefore, the above argument is not accepted.

The laws and regulations;

arrow