logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고정206
사문서위조등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a copy of the resident registration certificate in the above G name from a person without his/her name (title F) in the “E” office for a member agency of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 13-1 and 101 of the mobile phone service; and (b) received a copy of the resident registration certificate in the above G name with the knowledge that he/she did not consent to open the mobile phone from the above G; and (c) received the copy of the resident registration certificate in the above G name with the awareness that he/she did not consent to open the mobile phone

A. The Defendant stated “H”, “I”, “I”, “J, 107 Dong 409,” “Seoul Nowon-gu, J, 107 Dong 409,” and “G” in the applicant column on the paper of “D new application” located at the above time and place, and signed G on the name of G on May 26, 2015, respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above-mentioned names, forged a chapter “D new application” in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and duties, for the purpose of exercising the right and duties on the opening of a mobile phone.

B. At the time of the day described in the paragraph (a), the Defendant, at the third floor of the K Building in the city of the Government of Gyeonggi-do, sent “D new application” in the said G name to the employees M as if the document was duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant used a forged private document in collusion with the above person who was in a false name.

2. On June 2, 2015, the Defendant, at the office of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 13-1 Dong 101, issued a copy of the resident registration certificate under the above N in the name of the agent “E” to open the cell phone in the name of the agent “E” in the office “E”, and received a copy of the resident registration certificate under the above N in the name of the agent “E” and received the request to open the cell phone in the name of the former N in the name of the agent “E” and received the same through the knowledge that the above N in the name did not consent to open the cell phone, and

A. The defendant is "D." that had been kept at the above location at the time of the day.

arrow