logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.03.26 2013고정333
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On January 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 7, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a EXE car.

1. On September 2, 2012, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, despite being aware that he is unable to operate a motor vehicle without mandatory insurance, etc., on which he/she had already expired the mandatory insurance, etc. and operated the said motor vehicle on the road in front of the Gwangju Mine-gu Newdong around September 20, 2012.

2. On September 2, 2012, the Defendant driving the said vehicle on the road without a driver’s license on September 2, 2012, approximately 1 km from the front day of prosecution for the head of the Geum-dong in Gwangju Mine-gu to the front day of the Gwangju Bank located in the same Dong-dong without a driver’s license.

3. On September 2, 2012, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle at around 20:50 on September 2, 2012, while driving the said vehicle, and driving the front path of the Gwangju Bank located in the Gwangju Mine-dong, Gwangju, using two lanes from the distance of extreme instructors to black seat distance, making the front path of the Gwangju Bank, which is located in the Gwangju Mine-dong, flowed into one lane at a speed of about 20 kilometers per hour.

At night, as a driver, he had a duty of care to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to accurately operate the steering and the system.

Nevertheless, the part of the victim C (the 16-year-old driver) driver's DCA 110C Orala, which was proceeding directly in the same direction as the time-mail, due to the negligence that neglected this, conflict with the front right-hand wheels part of the vehicle of the defendant driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's vehicle, and went beyond the road.

The Defendant did not immediately take necessary measures, even though he damages the above Oral part to cover approximately KRW 567,00,00, such as a pentum, by occupational negligence.

arrow