logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.08.17 2017고단712
위증교사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 22, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to two years and six months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) in the Busan District Court's Dong Branch branch branch, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 13, 2016.

Around February 4, 2008, the Defendant, as the representative director of the Company B (hereinafter “B”) established for the purpose of real estate sale and lease business (hereinafter “B”), took overall charge of all the business affairs of the Company, including financial affairs, as the representative director of the Company B (hereinafter “C”) established for the purpose of real estate sale and lease business. On April 30, 2015, Busan District Court Decision 2015Kahap 10001, Busan District Court Decision 20101, Jun. 28, 2011, the Defendant took overall charge of all the business affairs of the Company, including financial affairs, as the representative director of the Company D (hereinafter “D”) located in Nam-gu, Busan (hereinafter “the representative director after June 29, 2014”), who was established for the purpose of providing educational services.

E is a person who, around September 28, 2012, sold 20% of the shares to the Defendant in KRW 80 million while he/she was in office as an auditor after depositing KRW 80 million in the above B and holding 20% of shares as an auditor.

On December 24, 2014, the Defendant was charged with embezzlement of approximately KRW 1.4 billion in the capital of the corporations of the above B and D with the Busan District Court’s branch branch, and was tried by the above court 2014Gohap 236, and was serving as an auditor in the above B to conceal the fact that the Defendant embezzled the funds of each of the above corporations.

E was willing to ask for false testimony.

On June 6, 2015, the Defendant, at the G office located in the Busan Southern-gu, Busan Southern-gu, asked the above E to the effect that “The Defendant would be present as a witness, and the defense counsel would ask for the overall management of the company, such as the agreement on stock transfer and the confirmation document related to the receipts and disbursements of the representative director,” and told E to make a false confession.

Thus, on June 23, 2015, the above case was about 14:00, Busan High Court Decision 19, Busan High Court Decision 304 Gohap 2014 Gohap 236, the above case was about 19, Busan High Court Decision 304, Busan High Court Decision 2014 Gohap 2014.

arrow